content top

US district court rules United Space Alliance must give US Labor Department access to information for review of its Cape Canaveral, Fla., facility

Decision supports February ruling by Office of Administrative Law Judges

WASHINGTON — The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled that United Space Alliance LLC must supply  the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs  with compensation information requested for a review of the company’s Cape Canaveral, Fla.,  facility. The ruling upholds a Feb. 28 decision by the department’s Office of  Administrative Law Judges.

“Workplace discrimination is not universal, but it is far  too common  —  and the people who suffer most are the American workers,” said  OFCCP Director Patricia A. Shiu. “At OFCCP, we are charged with identifying  which federal contractors discriminate in their hiring and pay practices, and  which are abiding by the law. We cannot serve our mission to protect workers if  companies refuse to give us access to the records they promised to keep and  share with us when they signed their contracts.”

United Space Alliance, a spaceflight operations company and  a joint venture between Boeing Co. and Lockheed Martin Corp., holds contracts with  NASA worth at least $8 billion dollars.

In 2009, OFCCP asked for information about United Space’s  affirmative action program and supporting documents to conduct a scheduled  compliance review. The initial review raised questions about the company’s pay  practices, leading OFCCP to request additional data and records in order to  complete the evaluation. The company refused to provide the records or to allow  OFCCP access to its premises to gather the requested information.

In November 2010, the Labor Department’s Office of the Solicitor filed a complaint with the department’s Office of Administrative Law Judges alleging  denial of access and requesting that United Space Alliance be compelled to  comply with the requirements of Executive Order 11246, Section 503 of the  Rehabilitation Act and Section 4212 of the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment  Assistance Act, as well as permit OFCCP access to its facility and records.

Following a February 2011 hearing, an administrative law  judge ruled in favor of OFCCP and issued a recommended decision and order that the  company provide access to the requested compensation information within 30 days  or be subject to contract suspension, cancellation and debarment. After  additional administrative procedures, United Space Alliance sought review of  the decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia under the  Administrative Procedures Act.

In a Nov. 14 decision, Chief  Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled in favor of OFCCP on all issues  —rejecting every  major argument United Space Alliance made  —  and ordered the contractor to  provide the requested documentation. “The [d]epartment has merely required  United Space to submit data about its employee compensation,” said Lamberth.  “Submission to such lawful investigations is the price of working as a federal  contractor.”

Lamberth’s order will become enforceable on Nov. 28.

OFCCP enforces Executive Order 11246, Section 503 of the  Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment  Assistance Act of 1974. As amended, these three laws require those who do  business with the federal government, both contractors and subcontractors, to  follow the fair and reasonable standard that they not discriminate in  employment on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, national origin,  disability or status as a protected veteran. For general information, call  OFCCP’s toll-free helpline at 800-397-6251 or visit its website at http://www.dol.gov/ofccp.

Legal Disclaimer

Please note that the materials contained within this web site have been prepared by Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C. for informational purposes only so that readers may learn more about the firm, the services it provides the background of its attorneys, and recent developments in the law. These materials do not constitute, and should not be considered, legal advice, and you are urged to consult with an attorney on your own specific legal matters. Transmission of the information contained in the Jennings, Strouss & Salmon web site is not intended to create, and receipt by the reader does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Jennings, Strouss & Salmon or any of its individual attorneys. While we would certainly like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Please do not send us any information about a matter that may involve you until you receive written authorization to do so from one of our attorneys. Unless otherwise indicated in individual attorney biographies, attorneys resident in the firm's various offices are not certified by the Board of Legal Specialization or a similar body of any State. This site may contain hyperlinks to Web sites operated by parties' independent from Jennings, Strouss & Salmon. Such hyperlinks are provided for your reference only. Jennings, Strouss & Salmon does not control such Web sites, and is not responsible for their content. Jennings, Strouss & Salmon's inclusion of hyperlinks to such Web sites does not imply any endorsement of the material on such Web sites or any association with their content. Your access and use of such sites, including information, material, products, and services therein, shall be solely at your own risk. Further, because the privacy policy of this Site is applicable only when you are on this Site, once linked to another Web site, you should read that site's privacy policy before disclosing any personal information.